As HR is increasing its presence as a strategic part of the business, key performance indicators, or KPIs, are becoming a key part of the language for discussing how it is actually performing. Recruiting, in some ways, is actually easier to measure because it is very similar to sales: you either have results or you don’t. This is evidenced by our recent study on talent acquisition priorities, where half of talent leaders said that they were focused on improving the recruiting process over the coming year. Today I want to talk about first year retention, a measure that I believe is going to continue to grow as a recruiting metric, even though many companies wouldn’t consider it even remotely linked to recruiting as of today. After all, aren’t we in the age of disruption?
Several years ago I ran into the wall. Figuratively, that is. I was spending about 50% of my time processing termination paperwork and 49% processing new hires. The other 1% was spent wondering just how we were going to sustain this churn. We were turning over about 50% of employees in positions that made up 90% of our workforce. In a company with more than 600 employees, you start to get the picture for just how bad things were. Like I said, my entire job was dedicated to moving the people into and out of the organization.
So I decided to try something. I gathered information. I pulled five years of archived files and noted termination reasons along with tenure and manager information. I looked into our Stone Age HRIS and pulled the same items for more recent terms. Once I had amassed the data, I started analyzing. I quickly identified a few key trends and highlighted them in the report I developed.
A few days later I presented my findings to the VP of HR, demonstrating through the data that approximately half of those terms not only happened within the first year, but within the first 90 days on the job. We were spending hours recruiting, training (each employee received over a dozen hours of training before starting work), and coaching these people, only to have all of that effort wasted. The data showed that if an employee made it past the 90-day mark, they were significantly likely to stay for a year or longer.
This is when I realized that recruiting has a very strong link to retention, especially first year retention.
When we think about retaining employees, a more senior staff member might come to mind. We automatically assume that if someone took the job just a few weeks ago that they are going to be excited and engaged for months to come (hint: the honeymoon period). Well, that depends on several things, including the recruiting process. Here are the ways the two are linked:
Bottom line: is it a great candidate experience?
In the past and still today, recruiting has been focused on some very surface level items: mainly time to fill and quality of hire. If we’re solely looking at those numbers, I could have phenomenal time to fill and quality numbers, only to have them dropping out of the workforce a few weeks or months later. Using a metric like first year retention as a recruiting metric provides a more well-rounded picture of just how well it is actually being performed. And it also brings a long-term, holistic view to recruiting.
If this topic interests you, then you should definitely check out our report, 3 Trends Impacting Talent Acquisition Measurement for additional data and details.
This piece originally appeared on my blog, upstartHR
As HR is increasing its presence as a strategic part of the business, key performance indicators, or KPIs, are becoming a key part of the language for discussing how it is actually performing. Recruiting, in some ways, is actually easier to measure because it is very similar to sales: you either have results or you don’t. This is evidenced by our recent study on talent acquisition priorities, where half of talent leaders said that they were focused on improving the recruiting process over the coming year. Today I want to talk about first year retention, a measure that I believe is going to continue to grow as a recruiting metric, even though many companies wouldn’t consider it even remotely linked to recruiting as of today. After all, aren’t we in the age of disruption?
Several years ago I ran into the wall. Figuratively, that is. I was spending about 50% of my time processing termination paperwork and 49% processing new hires. The other 1% was spent wondering just how we were going to sustain this churn. We were turning over about 50% of employees in positions that made up 90% of our workforce. In a company with more than 600 employees, you start to get the picture for just how bad things were. Like I said, my entire job was dedicated to moving the people into and out of the organization.
So I decided to try something. I gathered information. I pulled five years of archived files and noted termination reasons along with tenure and manager information. I looked into our Stone Age HRIS and pulled the same items for more recent terms. Once I had amassed the data, I started analyzing. I quickly identified a few key trends and highlighted them in the report I developed.
A few days later I presented my findings to the VP of HR, demonstrating through the data that approximately half of those terms not only happened within the first year, but within the first 90 days on the job. We were spending hours recruiting, training (each employee received over a dozen hours of training before starting work), and coaching these people, only to have all of that effort wasted. The data showed that if an employee made it past the 90-day mark, they were significantly likely to stay for a year or longer.
This is when I realized that recruiting has a very strong link to retention, especially first year retention.
When we think about retaining employees, a more senior staff member might come to mind. We automatically assume that if someone took the job just a few weeks ago that they are going to be excited and engaged for months to come (hint: the honeymoon period). Well, that depends on several things, including the recruiting process. Here are the ways the two are linked:
Bottom line: is it a great candidate experience?
In the past and still today, recruiting has been focused on some very surface level items: mainly time to fill and quality of hire. If we’re solely looking at those numbers, I could have phenomenal time to fill and quality numbers, only to have them dropping out of the workforce a few weeks or months later. Using a metric like first year retention as a recruiting metric provides a more well-rounded picture of just how well it is actually being performed. And it also brings a long-term, holistic view to recruiting.
If this topic interests you, then you should definitely check out our report, 3 Trends Impacting Talent Acquisition Measurement for additional data and details.
This piece originally appeared on my blog, upstartHR
As HR is increasing its presence as a strategic part of the business, key performance indicators, or KPIs, are becoming a key part of the language for discussing how it is actually performing. Recruiting, in some ways, is actually easier to measure because it is very similar to sales: you either have results or you don’t. This is evidenced by our recent study on talent acquisition priorities, where half of talent leaders said that they were focused on improving the recruiting process over the coming year. Today I want to talk about first year retention, a measure that I believe is going to continue to grow as a recruiting metric, even though many companies wouldn’t consider it even remotely linked to recruiting as of today. After all, aren’t we in the age of disruption?
Several years ago I ran into the wall. Figuratively, that is. I was spending about 50% of my time processing termination paperwork and 49% processing new hires. The other 1% was spent wondering just how we were going to sustain this churn. We were turning over about 50% of employees in positions that made up 90% of our workforce. In a company with more than 600 employees, you start to get the picture for just how bad things were. Like I said, my entire job was dedicated to moving the people into and out of the organization.
So I decided to try something. I gathered information. I pulled five years of archived files and noted termination reasons along with tenure and manager information. I looked into our Stone Age HRIS and pulled the same items for more recent terms. Once I had amassed the data, I started analyzing. I quickly identified a few key trends and highlighted them in the report I developed.
A few days later I presented my findings to the VP of HR, demonstrating through the data that approximately half of those terms not only happened within the first year, but within the first 90 days on the job. We were spending hours recruiting, training (each employee received over a dozen hours of training before starting work), and coaching these people, only to have all of that effort wasted. The data showed that if an employee made it past the 90-day mark, they were significantly likely to stay for a year or longer.
This is when I realized that recruiting has a very strong link to retention, especially first year retention.
When we think about retaining employees, a more senior staff member might come to mind. We automatically assume that if someone took the job just a few weeks ago that they are going to be excited and engaged for months to come (hint: the honeymoon period). Well, that depends on several things, including the recruiting process. Here are the ways the two are linked:
Bottom line: is it a great candidate experience?
In the past and still today, recruiting has been focused on some very surface level items: mainly time to fill and quality of hire. If we’re solely looking at those numbers, I could have phenomenal time to fill and quality numbers, only to have them dropping out of the workforce a few weeks or months later. Using a metric like first year retention as a recruiting metric provides a more well-rounded picture of just how well it is actually being performed. And it also brings a long-term, holistic view to recruiting.
If this topic interests you, then you should definitely check out our report, 3 Trends Impacting Talent Acquisition Measurement for additional data and details.
This piece originally appeared on my blog, upstartHR
22ND JANUARY
26Th JANUARY
SHERATON HOTEL – KAMPALA
UGANDA
29TH JANUARY
2ND FEBRURY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL -DEIRA
DUBAI
29TH JANUARY
2ND FEBRURY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL -NAIROBI
KENYA
29TH JANUARY
31ST JANUARY
MOUNT MERU HOTEL – ARUSHA
TANZANIA
29TH JANUARY
2ND FEBRURY
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
5TH FEBRUARY
9TH FEBRUARY
MOUNT MERU HOTEL - ARUSHA
TANZANIA
12TH FEBRUARY
16TH FEBRUARY
RADISSON BLU HOTEL - KIGALI
RWANDA
12TH FEBRUARY
16TH FEBRUARY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - NAIROBI
KENYA
12TH FEBRUARY
16TH FEBRUARY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - NAIROBI
KENYA
19TH FEBRUARY
23RD FEBRUARY
SHERATON HOTEL – KAMPALA
UGANDA
19TH FEBRUARY
23RD FEBRUARY
MANNA RESORT HOTEL – HARARE
ZIMBABWE
19TH FEBRUARY
23RD FEBRUARY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL -DEIRA
DUBAI
19TH FEBRUARY
23RD FEBRUARY
MALINDI - MOMBASA
KENYA
5TH MARCH
9TH MARCH
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL -NAIROBI
KENYA
19TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL
SINGAPORE
12TH MARCH
16TH MARCH
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL
DUBAI
19TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
19TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
19TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
RADISSON BLU HOTEL – CAPE TOWN
SOUTH AFRICA
20TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
MOUNT MERU HOTEL – ARUSHA
TANZANIA
20TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
SAWELA LODGE HOTEL - NAIVASHA
KENYA
19TH MARCH
23RD MARCH
SERENA BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
9TH APRIL
13TH APRIL
MANNA RESORT HOTEL - HARARE
ZIMBABWE
16TH APRIL
20TH APRIL
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - NAIROBI
KENYA
16TH APRIL
20TH APRIL
PRIDEINN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
23RD APRIL
27TH APRIL
HYATT HOTEL – DAR ES SALAAM
TANZANIA
23RD APRIL
27TH APRIL
MOUNT MERU HOTEL – ARUSHA
TANZANIA
23RD APRIL
27TH APRIL
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
23RD APRIL
27TH APRIL
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
23RD APRIL
27TH APRIL
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
14TH MAY
18TH MAY
RADISSON BLU HOTEL – CAPE TOWN
SOUTH AFRICA
14TH MAY
18TH MAY
PRESIDENT WALMONT – LILONGWE
MALAWI
21ST MAY
25TH MAY
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
21ST MAY
25TH MAY
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
21ST MAY
25TH MAY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
21ST MAY
25TH MAY
MOUNT MERU HOTEL - ARUSHA
TANZANIA
29TH MAY
1ST JUNE
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
18TH JUNE
22ND JUNE
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL -NAIROBI
KENYA
25TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - MARINA
DUBAI
25TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
25TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
24TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
24TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
25TH JUNE
29TH JUNE
PARK HYATT HOTEL - ZANZIBAR
ZANZIBAR
18TH JULY
20TH JULY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - NAIROBI
KENYA
16TH JULY
20TH JULY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - NAIROBI
KENYA
23RD JULY
27TH JULY
RADISSON BLU HOTEL – CAPE TOWN
SOUTH AFRICA
24TH JULY
27TH JULY
PRIDE INN BEACH HOTEL - MOMBASA
KENYA
23RD JULY
27TH JULY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI
23RD JULY
27TH JULY
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL - DEIRA
DUBAI